Small

One of the largest bibliographies of sage grouse literature available online

Description

The greater sage-grouse, a candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 has experienced population declines across its range in the sagebrush steppe ecosystems of western North America. Sage-grouse now occupy only 56% of their pre-settlement range, though they still occur in 11 western states and 2 Canadian provinces.

latest article added on August 2013

ArticleFirst AuthorPublished
From the field: Outbreak of West Nile virus in greater sage-grouse and guidelines for monitoring, handling, and submitting dead birdsWalker, BL2004

From the field: Outbreak of West Nile virus in greater sage-grouse and guidelines for monitoring, handling, and submitting dead birds

Keywords

Centrocercus urophasianus, emerging infectious disease, greater sage-grouse, lek count, Montana, population decline, Powder River Basin, survival, West Nile virus, Wyoming

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) resulted in a 25% decline in survival in four populations of radiomarked greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) across Alberta, Wyoming, and Montana in 2003. Unexpected impacts of WNV are disturbing because range-wide habitat loss and degradation already threaten sage-grouse populations. In the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana, late-summer survival of sage-grouse was lower at a site with confirmed WNV mortalities (20%) than at two sites without (76%). Dramatic declines in both male and female lek attendance at the WNV site the following spring suggest that outbreaks may threaten some local populations with extirpation. The key to understanding broader impacts of WNV on sage-grouse is to monitor additional populations and to determine whether populations infected in 2003 are again impacted this year. To facilitate this process, we describe a strategy for monitoring WNV mortality in the field and provide information on how to handle, store, and submit dead birds for testing.

Authors

Walker, BL; Naugle, DE; Doherty, KE; Cornish, TE

Year Published

2004

Publication

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Locations
DOI

10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[1000:FTFOOW]2.0.CO;2

Evaluation of the lek-count index for greater sage-grouseWalsh, DP2004

Evaluation of the lek-count index for greater sage-grouse

Keywords

bounded count, Centrocercus urophasianus, detection probability, greater sage-grouse, index, lek-attendance rates, lek counts, mark–resight, prairie grouse

Abstract

Counts of birds attending leks traditionally have been used as an index to the population size of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and, more recently, as a means to estimate population size. The relationship between this index and the actual population has not been studied. We used intensive counts of individually marked and unmarked greater sage-grouse on leks to evaluate how sex and age of birds, time of day, and time of season impact lek-attendance patterns and lek counts. These within-season sources of variation need to be considered when estimating detection probability of birds on leks and ultimately adjusting the lek-count index to estimate true population parameters. On average, 42% of marked adult males, 4% of marked hens, and 19% of yearling males were observed on leks per sighting occasion with all 15 known leks being intensively counted. We discovered that lek counts as currently conducted may be useful as an index to greater sage-grouse populations, but standardization of protocols is needed to allow for better spatial and temporal comparisons of lek-count data. Also the probability of detecting birds on leks must be estimated in order to relate lek counts to population parameters. Lastly, we evaluated use of the bounded-count methodology for correcting lek-count data. We showed large biases associated with this technique and below-nominal coverage of confidence intervals even at large numbers of counts, demonstrating the unreliability of the bounded-count method to correct lek-count data.

Authors

Walsh, DP; White, GC; Remington, TE; Bowden, DC

Year Published

2004

Publication

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Locations
DOI

10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[56:EOTLIF]2.0.CO;2

Adaptive management of prairie grouse: how do we get there?Aldridge, CL2004

Adaptive management of prairie grouse: how do we get there?

Keywords

adaptive management, Alberta, Centrocercus urophasianus, conservation plans, grazing, greater sage-grouse, habitat, Manitoba, policy planning, prairie sharp-tailed grouse, Tympanuchus phasianellus

Abstract

Managing prairie grouse has been largely a reactive process without any "true" management experiments being implemented, thereby limiting our ability to learn from management and enhance conservation efforts for declining prairie grouse populations. In a few cases where the potential existed for a passive or active adaptive approach, monitoring was insufficient to detect effects of changes in management practices. Similar problems appear to occur at planning stages in attempts to implement adaptive management for prairie grouse populations, preventing proper consideration of sound adaptive experiments that advance learning. Successful adaptive management begins with stakeholder gatherings following a policy planning process, which includes many steps, beginning with goal identification and understanding of uncertainties and culminating in model simulations to understand potential management policies. By following this process, the opportunity to implement successful management experiments can be enhanced. We discuss the successes and failures of prairie grouse management using 2 case studies, 1 for prairie sharp-tailcd grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus) in Manitoba and 1 for greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in southern Alberta. We describe ways in which active adaptive management could improve our understanding of prairie grouse population declines and outline a policy planning process that, if followed, will allow adaptive management to be successfully implemented, enhancing prairie grouse management and conservation.

Authors

Aldridge, CL; Boyce, MS; Baydack, RK

Year Published

2004

Publication

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Locations
DOI

10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[92:AMOPGH]2.0.CO;2

Occupied and unoccupied sage grouse habitat in Strawberry Valley, UtahBunnell, KD2004

Occupied and unoccupied sage grouse habitat in Strawberry Valley, Utah

Keywords

Centrocercus urophasianus, logistic regression, sagebrush, sage grouse

Abstract

This study evaluated multiple aspects of spring/summer sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat in Strawberry Valley, Utah by measuring vegetation associated with nest, brood and adult use sites. In addition, 3 types of random habitats were measured including available habitat within core use areas, random sagebrush (Artemisia spp.)/grass habitat outside core use are-as, and random sagebrush/grass habitat sites that had been converted to an understory of smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss) by past range management practices. Logistic regression was used to identify those habitat variables that discriminated between site types. Variables that discriminated adult habitat from brood rearing habitat included: 1) sagebrush height (P less than or equal to 0.01) and 2) forb diversity (P = 0.12) with sagebrush height being greater at adult sites and forb diversity greater at brood sites Variables that significantly discriminated occupied adult habitat from random habitat outside of core use areas included: 1) percent grass cover (P less than or equal to 0.01) and 2) area of sagebrush canopy (P = 0.03) with both variables having grater values in adult habitat. Variables that significantly discriminated occupied adult habitat from random habitat with a smooth brome understory included: 1) percent forb cover (P less than or equal to 0.01), 2) shrub canopy cover (P = 0.02), and 3) area of sagebrush canopy (P = 0.08) with all variables being greater in adult habitat. In addition, this study identified sagebrush age, sagebrush canopy area, and forb diversity as potentially important aspects of sage grouse habitat that have not been previously reported.

Authors

Bunnell, KD; Flinders, JT; Mitchell, DL; Warder, JH

Year Published

2004

Publication

Journal of Range Management

Locations
DOI

10.2307/4003983

History of greater sage-grouse in the Dakotas: Distribution and population trendsSmith, Joe T.2004

History of greater sage-grouse in the Dakotas: Distribution and population trends

Keywords

active, lek, Centrocercus urophasianus, greater sage-grouse, North Dakota, South Dakota

Abstract

The greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) has declined throughout its range and its status is of major concern to federal, state, and provincial wildlife agencies. We collected information on current and historical greater sage-grouse distribution and lek activity in western North and South Dakota. A steady decline in lek attendance by males occurred over the entire recorded period in North Dakota (1951-2002) and South Dakota (1972-2002). There was no apparent change in numbers of known active leks due to discovery of new leks, but there was an abandonment of regions once occupied by active leks.

Authors

Smith, Joe T.; Flake, Lester D.; Higgins, Kenneth F.; Kobriger, Gerald D.

Year Published

2004

Publication

Prairie Naturalist

Locations
The effects of raven removal on sage grouse nest success.Coates, Peter S.2004

The effects of raven removal on sage grouse nest success.

Keywords

Centrocercus urophasianus, nest success, predator control, raven damage management, sage grouse, video nest monitoring

Abstract

No abstract available

Authors

Coates, Peter S.; Delehanty, David J.

Year Published

2004

Publication

Proceedings of The Vertebrate Pest Conference

Locations
Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitatCrawford, John A.2004

Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat

Keywords

population dynamics, habitat, fire ecology, livestock grazing, herbicide, landscape ecology

Abstract

Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus and C. minimus) historically inhabited much of the sagebrush-dominated habitat of North America. Today, sage-grouse populations are declining throughout most of their range. Population dynamics of sage-grouse are marked by strong cyclic behavior. Adult survival is high, but is offset by low juvenile survival, resulting in low productivity. Habitat for sage-grouse varies strongly by life-history stage. Critical habitat components include adequate canopy cover of tall grasses (≥ 18 cm) and medium height shrubs (40–80 cm) for nesting, abundant forbs and insects for brood rearing, and availability of herbaceous riparian species for late-growing season foraging. Fire ecology of sage-grouse habitat changed dramatically with European settlement. In high elevation sagebrush habitat, fire return intervals have increased (from 12–24 to > 50 years) resulting in invasion of conifers and a consequent loss of understory herbaceous and shrub canopy cover. In lower elevation sagebrush habitat, fire return intervals have decreased dramatically (from 50–100 to < 10 years) due to invasion by annual grasses, causing loss of perennial bunchgrasses and shrubs. Livestock grazing can have negative or positive impacts on sage-grouse habitat depending on the timing and intensity of grazing, and which habitat element is being considered. Early season light to moderate grazing can promote forb abundance/availability in both upland and riparian habitats. Heavier levels of utilization decrease herbaceous cover, and may promote invasion by undesirable species. At rates intended to produce high sagebrush kill, herbicide-based control of big sagebrush may result in decreased habitat quality for sage-grouse. Light applications of tebuthiuron (N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea) can decrease canopy cover of sagebrush and increase grass and forb production which may be locally important to nesting and foraging activities. The ability of resource managers to address sage-grouse habitat concerns at large scales is aided greatly by geomatics technology and advances in landscape ecology. These tools allow unprecedented linkage of habitat and population dynamics data over space and time and can be used to retroactively assess such relationships using archived imagery. The present sage-grouse decline is a complex issue that is likely associated with multiple causative factors. Solving management issues associated with the decline will require unprecedented cooperation among wildlife biology, range science, and other professional disciplines.

Authors

Schroeder, Michael A., Crawford, John A., Miller, Richard F., Boyd, Chad S., Mosley, Jeffrey C., Gregg, Michael A., OLSON, RICH A., WEST, NEIL E. and WHITSON, TOM D.

Year Published

2004

Publication

Rangeland Ecology & Management

Locations
    DOI

    10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0002:EAMOSA]2.0.CO;2

    Silver Sagebrush Community Associations in Southeastern Alberta, Canada.Jones, Paul F2005

    Silver Sagebrush Community Associations in Southeastern Alberta, Canada.

    Keywords

    distribution ; greater sage-grouse ; height ; occupancy ; site

    Abstract

    Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat in southeastern Alberta is limited by the distribution of silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana Pursh). We conducted a landscape assessment of silver sagebrush throughout the current range of sage-grouse in southeastern Alberta. Black-and-white aerial photography acquired in the fall of 2001 was used to map silver sagebrush. Contact print stereo pairs were interpreted using a stereoscope and initially classified into 1 of 13 site classes based on soil type and landscape feature (e.g., recent agriculture). Each site polygon was further broken down into smaller polygons based on the percentage of silver sagebrush occupancy, density distribution, and height. A total of 4626 site polygons were identified and classed into 1 of 13 site classes. To ensure all assumptions of statistical tests were met, the data set was reduced to 9 site classes. The mean percentage of silver sagebrush occupancy was significantly different between the 9 site classes (F=...

    Authors

    Paul F Jones, Roy Penniket, Livio Fent, Joel Nicholson, Barry Adams

    Year Published

    2005

    Publication

    Rangeland Ecology & Management

    Locations
    DOI

    10.2111/1551-5028(2005)058[0400:SSCAIS]2.0.CO;2

    Timing of Vegetation Sampling at Greater Sage-Grouse Nests.Hausleitner, Doris2005

    Timing of Vegetation Sampling at Greater Sage-Grouse Nests.

    Keywords

    Centrocercus urophasianus ; Colorado ; nest site selection ; nest initiation

    Abstract

    Habitat management guidelines for greater sage-grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus, have been formulated, in part, based on studies of nest site selection. However, these guidelines may not represent conditions when the female initiates nesting because sampling occurs posthatch (> 30 days after nest initiation) to avoid disturbing incubating females. In 2002, we investigated differences in 22 habitat variables at initiation and hatch. Sampling was at 30 randomly selected active nests marked in 2001. There was no significant difference in structural or cover data (P > 0.05). Grass height and percent grass cover differed (P < 0.05) based on timing of sampling. Grass heights at the nest bowl and at 1 m from the edge of the nest bowl were 10 and 9 cm at initiation and 16 and 13 cm at hatch, respectively. Percent grass cover increased from 4% to 6% cover from initiation to hatch. Sampling occurred in a dry year; differences in grass heights and percent cover may be more pronounced in years of normal precipitation. Preliminary results indicated current habitat sampling techniques conducted posthatching adequately described selection of structural components of shrub height, visual obstruction, and percent cover of shrubs, bare ground, litter, and forbs at the nest site at initiation. Data need to be verified for other study areas and under different climatic conditions.

    Authors

    Doris Hausleitner, Kerry P Reese, Anthony D Apa

    Year Published

    2005

    Publication

    Rangeland Ecology & Management

    Locations
    DOI

    10.2111/04-170R2.1

    Modeling sage grouse: Progressive computational methods for linking a complex set of local, digital biodiversity and habitat data towards global conservation statements and decision-making systemsOnyeahialam, A2005

    Modeling sage grouse: Progressive computational methods for linking a complex set of local, digital biodiversity and habitat data towards global conservation statements and decision-making systems

    Keywords

    No keywords available

    Abstract

    Modem conservation management needs to link biological questions with computational approaches. As a global template, here we present such an approach from a local study on sage grouse breeding habitat, leks, in North Natrona County, Wyoming, using remote sensing imagery, digital datasets, spatial statistics, predictive modelling and a Geographic Information System (GIS). Four quantitative models that describe sage grouse breeding habitat selection were developed for multiple scales using logistic regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS-Salford Systems). Based on candidate models and AIC, important habitat predictor variables were elevation, distance to human development, slope, distance to roads, NDVI and distance to water, but not Sagebrush. Some predictors changed when using different scales and MARS. For the year 2011, a cumulative prediction index approach is presented on how the population viability of sage grouse can be assessed over time and space using Markov chain models for deriving future landscape scenarios and MARS for species predictions.

    Authors

    Onyeahialam, A; Huettmann, F; Bertazzon, S

    Year Published

    2005

    Publication

    Computational Science And Its Applications - Iccsa 2005, Pt 3

    Locations
    DOI

    10.1007/11424857_17

    Recent Articles

    The Secret Sex Lives of Sage-Grouse: Multiple Paternity and Intraspecific Nest Parasitism Revealed Through Genetic Analysis

    by Bird, Krista, Aldridge, Cameron, Carpenter, Jennifer, Paszkowski, Cynthia, Boyce, Mark and Coltman, David

    In lek-based mating systems only a few males are expected to obtain the majority of matings in a single breeding season and multiple mating is believed to be rare. We used 13 microsatellites to genotype greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) samples from 604 adults and 1206 offspring from 191 clutches (1999-2006) from Alberta, Canada, to determine paternity and polygamy (males and fema...

    published 2013 in Behavioral Ecology

    Seasonal Reproductive Costs Contribute to Reduced Survival of Female Greater Sage-grouse

    by Blomberg, Erik, Sedinger, James, Nonne, Daniel and Atamian, Michael

    Tradeoffs among demographic traits are a central component of life history theory. We investigated tradeoffs between reproductive effort and survival in female greater sage-grouse breeding in the American Great Basin, while also considering reproductive heterogeneity by examining covariance among current and future reproductive success. We analyzed survival and reproductive histories from 328 i...

    published 2013 in Journal of Avian Biology


    Greater Sage-Grouse and Severe Winter Conditions: Identifying Habitat for Conservation

    by Dzialak, Matthew, Webb, Stephen, Harju, Seth, Olson, Chad, Winstead, Jeffrey and Hayden Wing, Larry

    d Developing sustainable rangeland management strategies requires solution-driven research that addresses ecological issues within the context of regionally important socioeconomic concerns. A key sustainability issue in many regions of the world is conserving habitat that buffers animal populations from climatic variability, including seasonal deviation from long-term precipitation or temperat...

    published 2013 in Rangeland Ecology & Management

    Using Spatial Statistics and Point-Pattern Simulations to Assess the Spatial Dependency Between Greater Sage-Grouse and Anthropogenic Features

    by Gillan, Jeffrey K., Strand, Eva K., Karl, Jason W., Reese, Kerry P. and Laninga, Tamara

    The greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sage-grouse), a candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act, has experienced population declines across its range in the sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) steppe ecosystems of western North America. One factor contributing to the loss of habitat is the expanding human population with associated development and infrast...

    published 2013 in Wildlife Society Bulletin