Small

One of the largest bibliographies of sage grouse literature available online

Description

The greater sage-grouse, a candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 has experienced population declines across its range in the sagebrush steppe ecosystems of western North America. Sage-grouse now occupy only 56% of their pre-settlement range, though they still occur in 11 western states and 2 Canadian provinces.

latest article added on August 2013

ArticleFirst AuthorPublished
Sage Grouse versus Sagebrush Control in IdahoKLEBENOW, DA1970

Sage Grouse versus Sagebrush Control in Idaho

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

Spraying with herbicides to control sagebrush was detrimental to nesting grouse and to sage grouse broods. Nest- ing ceased when one area was sprayed and another contained a nest five years after spraying. Broods were less af- fected. One area contained broods three years after it had been sprayed, but variation existed from one area to the next, for another that was sprayed in 1962 was not being used in 1966.

Authors

KLEBENOW, DA

Year Published

1970

Publication

Journal of Range Management

Locations
DOI

10.2307/3896306

Two Hybrid Sage Grouse × Sharp-Tailed Grouse from Central MontanaENG, RL1971

Two Hybrid Sage Grouse × Sharp-Tailed Grouse from Central Montana

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

No abstract available

Authors

ENG, RL

Year Published

1971

Publication

The Condor: Ornithological Applications

Locations
DOI

10.2307/1366684

SUMMER MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY SAGE GROUSE BROODS IN CENTRAL MONTANAWALLESTA.RO1971

SUMMER MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY SAGE GROUSE BROODS IN CENTRAL MONTANA

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

The habitat use and movements of sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) broods were studied with the aid of radiotelemetry in central Montana during the summers of 1968 and 19619. Five hundred and eleven locations were obtained on 13 radio-marked sage grouse broods. In both sum- mers big sagebrush (Artemsa trixlentrata) in scattered (1-10 percent) and common (10-25 percent) densities received the greatest utilization by broods. Sagebrush heights at brood sites ranged mainly between 6 and 18 inches. For the 2 years combined, sagebrush canopy coverage averaged 14 percent for June, 12 percent for July, 10 percent for August, and 21 percent for September. Broods utilized sagebrush-grassland benches early in the summer (June and July) and shifted to greasewood (Sarcobatus vermicalatus) bottoms and/or alfalfa (Medicago sativa) fields as the forbs on the higher elevations became desiccated. Broods remained in these bottom types until late August and early September and then shifted back into sagebrush. Sizes of areas used by broods averaged 213 acres in sagebrush in early summer (June and July), 144 acres in alfalfa fields (July and August), 91 acres in greasewood bottoms (July and August), and 128 acres in sagebrush in late summer (August and September). Availability of food appeared to be the factor that determined the vegetational types utilized by broods during different periods of the summer

Authors

WALLESTA.RO

Year Published

1971

Publication

Journal of Wildlife Management

Locations
DOI

10.2307/3799881

Sage Grouse Winter Movements and Habitat Use in Central MontanaENG, RL1972

Sage Grouse Winter Movements and Habitat Use in Central Montana

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

Movements and habitat use by sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) were studied in central Montana during the winters of 1965-66 and 196S67. Two and three female sage grouse were radio-equipped and tracked during the two respective winters. Winter ranges of the five instrumented females ranged from approximately 2,615 to 7,760 acres. A 4-square-mile primary study area, containing over half of the relocations of the five instrumented birds, was separated into two big sagebrush (Ar- temisia tridentata) canopy cover classes on 16-inch: l-mile aerial photographs. Fifty-five percent of the primary study area was in the more dense ( over 20 percent canopy coverage ) and 45 percent in the less dense (under 20 percent canopy coverage) category. Observed use of the two canopy coverage classes was significantly (P < 0.01 ) different, a decided preference for the more dense stands being indicated. The characteristics of central Montana sage grouse winter areas (large expanses of dense sagebrush with little if any slope) make them prime targets of sagebrush control programs. Removal of sagebrush from these areas would greatly reduce their capacity to support wintering sage grouse

Authors

ENG, RL; SCHLADWE.P

Year Published

1972

Publication

The Journal of Wildlife Management

Locations
DOI

10.2307/3799198

Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse, Centrocercus urophaslanus.Wiley, R.H.1973

Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse, Centrocercus urophaslanus.

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

No abstract available

Authors

Wiley, R.H.

Year Published

1973

Publication

Animal Behav Monogr

Locations
The strut display of male sage grouse: a 'fixed' action pattern.Wiley, R.H.1973

The strut display of male sage grouse: a 'fixed' action pattern.

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

No abstract available

Authors

Wiley, R.H.

Year Published

1973

Publication

Behaviour

Locations
Breeding Season Movements and Habitat Selection of Male Sage GrouseWALLESTAD, R1974

Breeding Season Movements and Habitat Selection of Male Sage Grouse

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

Movements and habitat requirements of sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) cocks were studied in central Montana during the breeding seasons of 1968 and 1972. Fifteen sage grouse cocks were captured and radio-equipped. Movements of up to 0.8 mile (1.3 km) from the strutting grounds were common, with 82 percent of the locations falling beyond 0.2 mile (0.3 km). Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) with a canopy coverage of 20-50 percent occurred at 80 percent of the 110 locations mea- sured. Average sagebrush canopy coverage at these sites was 32 percent. Strutting grounds are key ac- tivity areas within wintering-nesting complexes which can be readily identified and delimited, and should be given complete protection from sagebrush removal projects. Results of this and previous studies in this area indicate that this protection should extend to a radius of no less than 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from strutting grounds

Authors

WALLESTAD, R; SCHLADWEILER, P

Year Published

1974

Publication

The Journal of Wildlife Management

Locations
DOI

10.2307/3800030

MOVEMENT AND NESTING OF SAGE GROUSE HENS IN CENTRAL MONTANAWALLESTAD, R1974

MOVEMENT AND NESTING OF SAGE GROUSE HENS IN CENTRAL MONTANA

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

Movements and nesting cover of sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) hens were studied in central Montana during the springs of 1969, 1970, 1971, and 1972. Thirty-one sage grouse hens were radio-equipped resulting in 22 nests being located. Nineteen additional nests were located dur- ing nest searches and work incidental to telemetry. Adults laid larger clutches than yearling hens and also were more successful in bringing off a brood. Sixty-eight percent of the 22 nests of radio-equipped hens occurred within 1.5 miles (2.5 km) of the strutting ground where the hens were captured. Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) formed the nesting cover over all of the nests located. Successful nests were located in sagebrush stands with a higher average canopy coverage than those of unsuccessful nests, and had significantly greater sagebrush cover within 24 inches (60 cm) of nest and within a 100-square foot (9-m2) plot around nest. Consideration of the ecological requirements of animals affected by pub- licly funded programs is important. This is especially true of sage grouse since extensive areas of sage- brush have already been eliminated or modified by such programs with little apparent regard for the welfare of this unique game bird

Authors

WALLESTAD, R; PYRAH, D

Year Published

1974

Publication

Journal of Wildlife Management

Locations
DOI

10.2307/3800029

The use of western harvester ant mounds as strutting locations by sage grouse.Geizentanner, K.I.1974

The use of western harvester ant mounds as strutting locations by sage grouse.

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

No abstract available

Authors

Geizentanner, K.I.; Clark, W.H.

Year Published

1974

Publication

The Condor: Ornithological Applications

Locations
PREDATION AND DAILY TIMING OF SAGE GROUSE LEKSHARTZLER, JE1974

PREDATION AND DAILY TIMING OF SAGE GROUSE LEKS

Keywords

No keywords available

Abstract

No abstract available

Authors

HARTZLER, JE

Year Published

1974

Publication

The Auk: Ornithological Advances

Locations

Recent Articles

The Secret Sex Lives of Sage-Grouse: Multiple Paternity and Intraspecific Nest Parasitism Revealed Through Genetic Analysis

by Bird, Krista, Aldridge, Cameron, Carpenter, Jennifer, Paszkowski, Cynthia, Boyce, Mark and Coltman, David

In lek-based mating systems only a few males are expected to obtain the majority of matings in a single breeding season and multiple mating is believed to be rare. We used 13 microsatellites to genotype greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) samples from 604 adults and 1206 offspring from 191 clutches (1999-2006) from Alberta, Canada, to determine paternity and polygamy (males and fema...

published 2013 in Behavioral Ecology

Seasonal Reproductive Costs Contribute to Reduced Survival of Female Greater Sage-grouse

by Blomberg, Erik, Sedinger, James, Nonne, Daniel and Atamian, Michael

Tradeoffs among demographic traits are a central component of life history theory. We investigated tradeoffs between reproductive effort and survival in female greater sage-grouse breeding in the American Great Basin, while also considering reproductive heterogeneity by examining covariance among current and future reproductive success. We analyzed survival and reproductive histories from 328 i...

published 2013 in Journal of Avian Biology


Greater Sage-Grouse and Severe Winter Conditions: Identifying Habitat for Conservation

by Dzialak, Matthew, Webb, Stephen, Harju, Seth, Olson, Chad, Winstead, Jeffrey and Hayden Wing, Larry

d Developing sustainable rangeland management strategies requires solution-driven research that addresses ecological issues within the context of regionally important socioeconomic concerns. A key sustainability issue in many regions of the world is conserving habitat that buffers animal populations from climatic variability, including seasonal deviation from long-term precipitation or temperat...

published 2013 in Rangeland Ecology & Management

Using Spatial Statistics and Point-Pattern Simulations to Assess the Spatial Dependency Between Greater Sage-Grouse and Anthropogenic Features

by Gillan, Jeffrey K., Strand, Eva K., Karl, Jason W., Reese, Kerry P. and Laninga, Tamara

The greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sage-grouse), a candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act, has experienced population declines across its range in the sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) steppe ecosystems of western North America. One factor contributing to the loss of habitat is the expanding human population with associated development and infrast...

published 2013 in Wildlife Society Bulletin